Home  
  About  
  Americas  
  Global  
  Iraq  
  Palestine  
  Zionism  
  Stooges  
  Video  
  Blog  
  Links  
  • A world of psychopaths
  • Freedom loved and hated
  • Where are the voices?
  • Pirates and false flags
  • "To be or not to be"
  • It's past time for change
  • Arabs
  • Arab bashing
  • Why? The unanswered question
  • Blair the camera man
  • Welcome to Zionized Britain
  • An evening in Jounieh
  • Muhammad's sword
  • I was there when the Americans bombed Libya
  • Is BBC coverage of the Palestine-Israel conflict biased?
  • Between good and evil
  • Why do we hate them?
  • The BBC, its former Gaza correspondent and an Arab
  • Israel ready to bomb Iran
  • Mass paranoia
  • Considering cultures
  • Open letter to UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband
  • The major revolutions
  • So what about Iran?
  • The lesson from Iraq is to nuke Iran
  • Shahid Malik MP is “deeply disappointed”
  • The last refuge
  • Tony Blair should not be shot or blown to pieces
  • Deadly sins
  • Temperature rising
  • Scandal of Zionist funding of Britain's Labour Party
  • A plot against Britain?
  • Swinging Gates
  • What’s in a name?
  • What the US Congress knows about Iraq and Iran
  • Tony Blair moves on
  • Impossible demands
  • Requiem for principle and law in Britain
  • The pain of Gaza
  • The hangman revisited
  • Two Jewish jokes (and a Hain in the middle)
  • Gaza and the West
  • Britain should stop marketing America’s war on Afghanistan
  • What have you got against Gaza, Mr Brown?
  • Send them to Gaza, not Auschwitz
  • The USA, Russia and the spinoff from Iraq and Iran
  • The last know-it-all
  • Admiral Fallon’s resignation
  • "Not you! You!!!"
  • Christians versus Osama Bin Laden
  • Untold truths
  • Anthony Charles Lynton Blair due on trial in the Hague
  • Assassination – a game for all
  • French resistance in the service of Palestine
  • Condoleezza Rice and Iran’s nuclear weapons
  • The deadliest terrorists
  • The IAEA and Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons
  • Iran’s “provocative missile test”
  • Why not?
  • The speech Gordon Brown should have made to the Israeli parliament
  • Anti-war – the way forward
  • Russians out of South Ossetia? Americans out of Iraq and Afghanistan!
  • The role of the United States in Europe
  • Hottentot morality
  • The barbarians
  • Working with Russia
  • Britain’s Guardian newspaper yields to pressure from pro-war Zionist smear-mongers
  • The Anglo-American financial disaster
  • How the EU turns a “blind eye” to Israel’s crimes...
  • Euro-Russian partnership
  • Caught in bed with evil
  • Britain's Lord Bingham says the Iraq war is illegal
  • Dance with the devil and you will get burnt
  • Open letter to the British foreign secretary
  • Understanding the USA’s world mission
  • Blair – For Virtue, Vibrio and God
  • Eyes on Somalia
  • Letter to the EU Council of Ministers
  • Russian gas cuts – a United States and Afghanistan connection?
  • Gordon Brown’s taxpayer ripoff
  • Gordon Brown, here is my shopping list
  • Call for arrest of 15 Israeli leaders suspected of war crimes in Gaza
  • The BBC’s pact with Israel
  • The BBC’s warped impartiality
  • Ehud Barak is a war criminal, like his soldiers!
  • Open letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon
  • Underreported news, ignored news
  • Ain't she a woman!
  • An open letter to Pope Benedict XVI
  • Time to pull the plug on the BBC
  • “In the name of God, go!”
  • Where is the burden of proof?
  • The International Court of Justice must investigate the Iraq war
  • The biblical ignorance of the “Anti-Defamation League”
  • A realist’s view of the protests in Iran
  • Anomalies of the Western mind
  • Iran's "most treacherous" enemy, Britain
  • Europe’s future with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization
  • The British Army should cite the Nuremburg Principles and leave Afghanistan
  • On the horns of a dilemma
  • “Reckless” to sail in international waters - official
  • Cruel and mindless carnage
  • Fears that spring from ignorance
  • British Lance-Corporal Joe Glenton refuses to go to Afghanistan
  • Aung San Suu Kyi - the iron butterfly
  • Europe is under imminent threat
  • People say the strangest things?
  • “Racist” BNP leader’s public humiliation masks an ugly truth
  • Losing in Afghanistan and in Europe
  • Bonaparte, Blair and Co.
  • The Afghanistan war on Remembrance Sunday
  • Will the Church act to save the children of Gaza this Christmas?
  • British pro-Israel Jewish newspaper launches attack on Middle East news website
  • The height of kitsch: time for Germany to reassess its relations with Israel
  • Is it a flogging offence to send friendly greetings to Gaza’s beleaguered premier?
  • Britain’s Jewish foreign secretary rushes to rescue Israeli war crimes suspect
  • Britain’s Foreign Office wimps surrender to Israeli thugs
  • Masters of illusion tell deceiving tales
  • Will the Chilcot Inquiry be a whitewash?
  • Relax, Holy Father. Viva Palestina and George Galloway are doing the job for you
  • Yemen – the new enemy
  • When Israel snaps its fingers British ministers jump
  • “Us” versus “them”: on the meaning of fascism
  • Beware of the BBC
  • The Blair Iraq conspiracy is unravelling
  • Britain's Jewish Chronicle warns Gordon Brown: safeguard Israeli war criminals or else
  • Blair survives Iraq Inquiry without a scratch
  • Russia, China and the American free lunch
  • Bush to The Hague
  • British politician Jenny Tonge sacrificed (again) to appease Zionists
  • Campus claws: beating Israel lobbyists through debate
  • Dutch government falls over Afghanistan
  • Cut the "ambiguity", ambassador, or pack your bags
  • America and world economic meltdown
  • Muslims are their own worst enemy
  • So when are you going to make war on Israel, Mr Brown?
  • Britain and America linked to Somali pirates, Somalia still suffers
  • Televised election debate another shining example of Britain’s commitment to democracy
  • Leaving Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan: our education by collateral murder
  • What Anglicans need is another Tutu as top cat
  • Polanski’s ghost writer: Tony Blair and the absent Zionists and Israel lobbyists
  • UK politicians fail the Afghanistan, economics and banking tests
  • Archbishop of Canterbury’s deafening silence over Israeli bullying
  • In Israel's pockets: the shame of Britain's political parties
  • UK general election: Shhh... don’t mention the Israeli occupation
  • Either way, Zionists win in Britain’s confused election
  • Which whore should UK Liberal Democrat leader Clegg jump into bed with?
  • Verdict on UK’s hung parliament: a plague on all your houses!
  • Delusions and illusions of press freedom
  • Who murdered UK weapons inspector Dr David Kelly?
  • Coalition: another example of Britain’s sham democracy
  • Jews are eight times over-represented in UK parliament
  • Framing Pakistan: how the pro-Israel media enables India’s surrogate warfare
  • Brazil-Turkey-Iran nuclear deal and US resistance to the real new world order
  • Punish North Korea! Who sank the Cheonan?
  • Letter to UK Foreign Office Minister Henry Bellingham
  • US wants South Korean boat’s sinking as they tell it but Russia and China don’t agree
  • Fox in the henhouse: can we trust Israeli security companies?
  • Can Russia offer freedom and security to Europe?
  • If Palestinians are granted the right to work, Lebanon wins
  • Britain more interested in saving Israelis from garden shed rockets than British citizens from Israeli pirates
  • The dollar’s metamorphosis
  • How to create your very own terrorist state
  • Dr David Kelly’s postmortem report must be released
     
    "To be or not to be"

    What turns victims into suicide bombers?

    By Paul J. Balles*

    17 September 2004

    Paul J. Balles examines the phenomenon of suicide bombers from the socio-psychological perspective. Noting the French sociologist and philosopher Emile Durkheim's remark that, when an individual's needs surpass his capacity to satisfy them, "the result can only be friction, pain, lack of productivity and a general weakening of the impulse to live", he says: "The suicide bomber, unable to develop and express his individuality under [Israeli] occupation and unable to serve his society in constructive ways, turns to a goal beyond this world."

    To be, or not to be: that is the question:
    Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
    The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
    Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
    And by opposing end them? - William Shakespeare

    Suicide is man's way of telling God "you can't fire me - I quit". - Bill Maher

    Then is it sin to rush into the secret house of death, ere death dare come to us? - William Shakespeare

    A report on MSNBC news says that "a suicide takes place somewhere around the world every 40 seconds, or nearly one million a year, and the rate looks set to surge over the next two decades".

    The report adds that suicide is a major world health problem, that it's largely preventable. The highest suicide rates (in percentages of population) have been in former Communist states - Lithuania, Estonia, Russia, Latvia and Hungary, followed by Sri Lanka, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Slovenia and Finland.

    Judging from numbers alone in 2000, the greatest incidents of suicide have occurred in China (195,000), where there are more women suicides than men; India (87,000); Russia (52,000); and the USA (31,000). While there have been suicides in Arab countries, they certainly haven't figured among the major sufferers either in numbers or rates per 1,000.

    My interest in the topic has been fuelled by a wish to discover authoritative studies about what leads a person to self-destruct. According to New Scientist Digital (8 September 2004), "Suicide kills more people each year than road traffic accidents in most European countries, the World Health Organization is warning. And, globally, suicide takes more lives than murder and war put together, says the agency in a call for action."

    The death toll from suicide  at almost one million people per year ­ accounts for half of all violent deaths worldwide, said the WHO report. It also noted, "people in Latin America, Muslim countries and a few Asian nations are least likely to die by their own hand".

    "It's important to realise that suicide is preventable," points out Lars Mehlum, president of the International Association for Suicide Prevention. "And that having access to the means of suicide is both an important risk factor and determinant of suicide."

    Since high self-esteem and social "connectedness" can protect against suicide, it's logical to conclude that the absence of these factors can play an important role leading to suicide. The problem not only affects those who die at their own hands. It's been estimated by health officials that 20 times that number have failed in their attempts to commit suicide.

    The yearly costs associated with self-afflicted injuries have been estimated in the billions of dollars. As pointed out by the International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP), "For every suicide death there are many survivors; their lives are profoundly affected emotionally, socially and economically."

    Professor Mehlum, the president of IASP, said, "Suicidal behaviour has a large number of underlying causes which are complex and interact with one another. Factors such as living in poverty, unemployment, loss of loved ones, arguments with family or friends, legal or work-related problems are all acknowledged as risk factors when affecting those who are predisposed or otherwise especially vulnerable to self-harm."

    In a scholarly paper on "Suicide (1897)", Robert Alun Jones reports on studies by the great French sociologist and philosopher Emile Durkheim that dealt with a whole range of topics including:

    1. What is suicide?
    2. Extra-social causes
    3. Social causes and social types
    a. Egoistic suicide
    b. Altruistic suicide
    c. Anomic suicide
    4. Suicide as a social phenomenon
    5. Critical remarks

    "Suicide thus varies inversely with the degree of integration of the religious, domestic and political groups of which the individual forms a part; in short, as a society weakens or "disintegrates," the individual depends less on the group, depends more upon himself, and recognizes no rules of conduct beyond those based upon private interests. Durkheim called this state of "excessive individualism" egoism, and the special type of self-inflicted death it produces "egoistic suicide".

    If suicides are low in Arab societies, what accounts for the increasing rates of suicide in Bahrain, especially among Indians? With the expatriate society weak and the individual independent of the group, he becomes the egoistic suicide defined by Durkheim. That certainly wouldn't explain the suicides of the Palestinians. For this, Durkheim had another explanation:

    "But if excessive individuation thus leads to suicide, so does insufficient individuation: ...men on the threshold of old age, women upon the deaths of their husbands, followers and servants upon the deaths of their chiefs - in which the person kills himself because it is his duty." Such a sacrifice, Durkheim argued, is imposed by society for social purposes; and for society to be able to do this, the individual personality must have little value, a state Durkheim called "altruism".

    Durkheim notes that "the altruist commits himself to a goal beyond this world, and henceforth this world is an obstacle and burden to him... the unhappiness of the altruist... springs from hope, faith, even enthusiasm, and affirms itself in acts of extraordinary energy".

    Those responsible for the suicide of the Palestinian bomber may know full well what their treatment of the Palestinians does to their psyches, in which case they remain entirely responsible for the deaths incurred.

    To quote Durkheim again, "No living being can be happy unless its needs are sufficiently proportioned to its means; for if its needs surpass its capacity to satisfy them, the result can only be friction, pain, lack of productivity and a general weakening of the impulse to live."

    Whether they knew the outcome or not, this means that the Israeli occupation forces have themselves been responsible for the deaths made of their own sacrificial lambs that they have attributed to terrorists.

    Palestinian suicide bombers have a kinship with the Romans at the time of Cato. Romans viewed suicide as a rational act, calmly undertaken, carefully planned in advance and intended for public consumption (almost entirely at odds with our modern conception of suicide).

    Whereas most modern societies tend to view nearly all suicides as irrational, hastily planned and executed in a fit of passion, and usually undertaken alone, this type of suicide was the sort most deplored by the Romans, the type of suicide they sought to avoid when choosing their own deaths.

    Thus Tacitus criticizes a man who leapt to his end from a building for his "sudden and undignified death" and reports that his mother was blamed and banished from Rome for 10 years. The Romans never condoned hasty, messy, irrational suicides. They haven't been by Arabs either.

    The suicide bomber, unable to develop and express his individuality under occupation and unable to serve his society in constructive ways, turns to a goal beyond this world.

    Fouad Ajami US News reports, "We love death," said that quintessential merchant of death Osama bin Laden, "as much as the infidels love life." Ajami adds, "The young homicide bomber walking into a Tel Aviv discotheque has come to serve a warrant of death on people his age whose ways he yearns for yet cannot have."

    Ajami concludes his article by saying, "...the 9/11 commission recently recommended the launching of a campaign of public diplomacy in the Muslim world. But this is illusion. For at heart, this war for Islam is one for Muslims to fight. It is for them to recover their faith from the purveyors of terror."

    Both conclusions are illusion. "Diplomacy in the Muslim world" will do nothing to change the circumstances - the sense of hopelessness imposed on the Palestinians and the oppression and humiliation of occupation felt by the Iraqis - under which the victims feel compelled to commit suicide.

    The Muslim clerics that Ajami refers to as "purveyors of terror" are no more responsible for the conditions experienced by their congregations than their followers themselves are.

    Neither the clerics nor their followers are fooled by the propaganda that calls the suicide bombers terrorists while ignoring the gross terrorism of occupation forces that murder, maim, destroy homes and livelihoods and instil constant fear with fighter jets, bombers, tanks, helicopter gunships and a well-armed military machine.

    The propagandists may deceive their willing audiences in the West, but they don't delude either the hopeless who have been impelled to suicide or those who feel empathy for the abject victims of oppression.

    Something needs to be done about the disgusting tendency in the West to feel sorry for the victims of the victims. As Cesare Pavese has written, "No one ever lacks a good reason for suicide." It's time to stop bluffing and bullying and to start corrective work on the reasons.



    *Paul Balles is a retired American university professor and freelance writer who has lived in the Middle East for 35 years. For more information, see http://www.pballes.com.




    Copyright © Redress Information & Analysis.
    All rights reserved.